← All councils

Somerset

Mendip planning data

6,858 planning applications from Mendip. Ask questions about them in plain English from ChatGPT or Claude — no coding, about two minutes to set up — or pull them straight into your own software. 16 pieces of information are filled in on at least 90% of records.

6,858
Applications
145
Enforcement notices
153
Appeals
1975–2026
Date range

What Mendip decides

Mendip has approved 89.14% of the 5,684 applications it has decided since January 2023. Across the 225 councils with a comparable caseload the range is 71.37% to 99.14%, so this is below the middle of the pack (89.18%).

89.14%
Approved, of 5,684 decided
59
Median days to a decision
107.8
Average days

What it mostly decides

The mix of application types Mendip handles — useful for telling whether your kind of application is routine here or unusual.

Application typeApplications Share
Householder 1,433 20.9%
Full 1,405 20.5%
Tree 985 14.4%
Conditions 901 13.1%
Other 741 10.8%

How approval rates and decision times vary across the country →

What Mendip actually fills in

A "field" is one piece of information on an application — the decision date, the applicant's name, the address. Councils fill these in inconsistently, so this table measures how often Mendip actually provides each one, across all 6,858 records. Anything listed as reliable you can count on; anything lower, check the council's own record before relying on it.

Once this data is connected to ChatGPT or Claude you can just ask "what information does Mendip actually fill in?" and get these same numbers back. How to connect →

Reliable — 90% or more of records

InformationRecords with it Coverage
Address
address
6,858 100.0%
Description of the works
description
6,858 100.0%
Date received
received_date
6,858 100.0%
Council reference
reference
6,858 100.0%
Ward
ward
6,852 99.9%
Application type
application_type
6,843 99.8%
Applicant's name
applicant_name
6,803 99.2%
Agent's email
agent_email
6,771 98.7%
Case officer
case_officer
6,757 98.5%
Status
status
6,465 94.3%
Status (standardised wording)
status_normalized
6,465 94.3%
Decision
decision
6,394 93.2%
Decision date
decision_date
6,394 93.2%
Decision (standardised wording)
decision_normalized
6,364 92.8%
Alternative reference
alternative_reference
6,281 91.6%
Who decided it (officer or committee)
decision_level
6,280 91.6%

Partial — use with care

InformationRecords with it Coverage
Agent's name
agent_name
5,620 81.9%
Agent's phone
agent_phone
5,601 81.7%
Postcode
postcode
5,515 80.4%
Agent's company
agent_company
5,366 78.2%
Standardised type
standard_type
2,007 29.3%

Rarely or never published

InformationRecords with it Coverage
Appeal decision
appeal_decision
148 2.2%
Appeal decision (standardised wording)
appeal_decision_normalized
148 2.2%
Type of development
development_type
0 0.0%
Officer's recommendation
officer_recommendation
0 0.0%

Not published by this council

Mendip's portal has been verified not to publish these fields at all — different from a field that exists but is rarely filled in.

Map coordinates (easting) Map coordinates (northing)

Get this data

Ask it in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect it once with your email address, then ask questions like "which extensions were refused in Mendip last year?" or "what's the planning history of this address?" — no coding, about two minutes to set up. Setup guide →

Or call it from your own code

curl -H "X-Api-Key: pk_..." \
  "https://ukplanningapi.co.uk/v1/applications?council_id=321&limit=5"

Council id for Mendip is 321. Full API reference for developers →

Get free access to Mendip data

500 lookups a month, free. No card, no password — we email you a sign-in link and you're in.