Derbyshire
291 planning applications from High Peak. Ask questions about them in plain English from ChatGPT or Claude — no coding, about two minutes to set up — or pull them straight into your own software. 8 pieces of information are filled in on at least 90% of records.
We hold only 291 applications here. Treat an absent record as "not published to us", never as "no such application".
High Peak has approved 88% of the 75 applications it has decided since January 2023. Across the 225 councils with a comparable caseload the range is 71.37% to 99.14%, so this is below the middle of the pack (89.18%).
The mix of application types High Peak handles — useful for telling whether your kind of application is routine here or unusual.
| Application type | Applications | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 291 | 100.0% |
How approval rates and decision times vary across the country →
A "field" is one piece of information on an application — the decision date, the applicant's name, the address. Councils fill these in inconsistently, so this table measures how often High Peak actually provides each one, across all 291 records. Anything listed as reliable you can count on; anything lower, check the council's own record before relying on it.
Once this data is connected to ChatGPT or Claude you can just ask "what information does High Peak actually fill in?" and get these same numbers back. How to connect →
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Addressaddress |
291 | 100.0% | |
Applicant's nameapplicant_name |
291 | 100.0% | |
Who decided it (officer or committee)decision_level |
291 | 100.0% | |
Description of the worksdescription |
291 | 100.0% | |
Date receivedreceived_date |
291 | 100.0% | |
Council referencereference |
291 | 100.0% | |
Statusstatus |
291 | 100.0% | |
Case officercase_officer |
289 | 99.3% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Postcodepostcode |
252 | 86.6% | |
Status (standardised wording)status_normalized |
249 | 85.6% | |
Agent's nameagent_name |
216 | 74.2% | |
Decisiondecision |
154 | 52.9% | |
Wardward |
136 | 46.7% | |
Decision (standardised wording)decision_normalized |
83 | 28.5% | |
Decision datedecision_date |
82 | 28.2% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Appeal decision (standardised wording)appeal_decision_normalized |
0 | 0.0% | |
Application typeapplication_type |
0 | 0.0% | |
Standardised typestandard_type |
0 | 0.0% |
High Peak's portal has been verified not to publish these fields at all — different from a field that exists but is rarely filled in.
Agent's company Agent's email Agent's phone Alternative reference Appeal decision Type of development Map coordinates (easting) Map coordinates (northing) Officer's recommendation
Connect it once with your email address, then ask questions like "which extensions were refused in High Peak last year?" or "what's the planning history of this address?" — no coding, about two minutes to set up. Setup guide →
curl -H "X-Api-Key: pk_..." \ "https://ukplanningapi.co.uk/v1/applications?council_id=81641&limit=5"
Council id for High Peak is 81641.
Full API reference for developers →
500 lookups a month, free. No card, no password — we email you a sign-in link and you're in.