Somerset
80 planning applications from Exmoor. Ask questions about them in plain English from ChatGPT or Claude — no coding, about two minutes to set up — or pull them straight into your own software. 11 pieces of information are filled in on at least 90% of records.
We hold only 80 applications here. Treat an absent record as "not published to us", never as "no such application".
Exmoor has approved 92.31% of the 13 applications it has decided since January 2023. Across the 225 councils with a comparable caseload the range is 71.37% to 99.14%, so this is at or above the middle of the pack (89.18%).
The mix of application types Exmoor handles — useful for telling whether your kind of application is routine here or unusual.
| Application type | Applications | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full | 20 | 25.0% |
| Householder | 17 | 21.2% |
| Conditions | 14 | 17.5% |
| Tree | 8 | 10.0% |
| Other | 8 | 10.0% |
How approval rates and decision times vary across the country →
A "field" is one piece of information on an application — the decision date, the applicant's name, the address. Councils fill these in inconsistently, so this table measures how often Exmoor actually provides each one, across all 80 records. Anything listed as reliable you can count on; anything lower, check the council's own record before relying on it.
Once this data is connected to ChatGPT or Claude you can just ask "what information does Exmoor actually fill in?" and get these same numbers back. How to connect →
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Addressaddress |
80 | 100.0% | |
Agent's nameagent_name |
80 | 100.0% | |
Applicant's nameapplicant_name |
80 | 100.0% | |
Application typeapplication_type |
80 | 100.0% | |
Case officercase_officer |
80 | 100.0% | |
Description of the worksdescription |
80 | 100.0% | |
Postcodepostcode |
80 | 100.0% | |
Council referencereference |
80 | 100.0% | |
Statusstatus |
80 | 100.0% | |
Status (standardised wording)status_normalized |
80 | 100.0% | |
Date receivedreceived_date |
78 | 97.5% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Decisiondecision |
32 | 40.0% | |
Wardward |
30 | 37.5% | |
Decision datedecision_date |
15 | 18.8% | |
Decision (standardised wording)decision_normalized |
15 | 18.8% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Alternative referencealternative_reference |
0 | 0.0% | |
Appeal decision (standardised wording)appeal_decision_normalized |
0 | 0.0% | |
Standardised typestandard_type |
0 | 0.0% |
Exmoor's portal has been verified not to publish these fields at all — different from a field that exists but is rarely filled in.
Agent's company Agent's email Agent's phone Appeal decision Who decided it (officer or committee) Type of development Map coordinates (easting) Map coordinates (northing) Officer's recommendation
Connect it once with your email address, then ask questions like "which extensions were refused in Exmoor last year?" or "what's the planning history of this address?" — no coding, about two minutes to set up. Setup guide →
curl -H "X-Api-Key: pk_..." \ "https://ukplanningapi.co.uk/v1/applications?council_id=257&limit=5"
Council id for Exmoor is 257.
Full API reference for developers →
500 lookups a month, free. No card, no password — we email you a sign-in link and you're in.