West Sussex
2,715 planning applications from Crawley. Ask questions about them in plain English from ChatGPT or Claude — no coding, about two minutes to set up — or pull them straight into your own software. 11 pieces of information are filled in on at least 90% of records.
Crawley has approved 86.85% of the 1,840 applications it has decided since January 2023. Across the 225 councils with a comparable caseload the range is 71.37% to 99.14%, so this is below the middle of the pack (89.18%).
The mix of application types Crawley handles — useful for telling whether your kind of application is routine here or unusual.
| Application type | Applications | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Full | 892 | 32.9% |
| Other | 729 | 26.9% |
| Tree | 649 | 23.9% |
| Certificate | 270 | 9.9% |
| Advertisement | 102 | 3.8% |
How approval rates and decision times vary across the country →
A "field" is one piece of information on an application — the decision date, the applicant's name, the address. Councils fill these in inconsistently, so this table measures how often Crawley actually provides each one, across all 2,715 records. Anything listed as reliable you can count on; anything lower, check the council's own record before relying on it.
Once this data is connected to ChatGPT or Claude you can just ask "what information does Crawley actually fill in?" and get these same numbers back. How to connect →
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Addressaddress |
2,714 | 100.0% | |
Case officercase_officer |
2,714 | 100.0% | |
Date receivedreceived_date |
2,714 | 100.0% | |
Council referencereference |
2,715 | 100.0% | |
Statusstatus |
2,714 | 100.0% | |
Applicant's nameapplicant_name |
2,711 | 99.9% | |
Description of the worksdescription |
2,713 | 99.9% | |
Application typeapplication_type |
2,690 | 99.1% | |
Agent's nameagent_name |
2,646 | 97.5% | |
Who decided it (officer or committee)decision_level |
2,634 | 97.0% | |
Status (standardised wording)status_normalized |
2,611 | 96.2% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Decisiondecision |
2,396 | 88.3% | |
Decision datedecision_date |
2,389 | 88.0% | |
Decision (standardised wording)decision_normalized |
2,330 | 85.8% | |
Standardised typestandard_type |
2,072 | 76.3% |
| Information | Records with it | Coverage | |
|---|---|---|---|
Postcodepostcode |
215 | 7.9% | |
Wardward |
195 | 7.2% | |
Appeal decisionappeal_decision |
59 | 2.2% | |
Appeal decision (standardised wording)appeal_decision_normalized |
59 | 2.2% | |
Agent's companyagent_company |
9 | 0.3% | |
Agent's emailagent_email |
3 | 0.1% | |
Map coordinates (easting)easting |
0 | 0.0% | |
Map coordinates (northing)northing |
0 | 0.0% |
Crawley's portal has been verified not to publish these fields at all — different from a field that exists but is rarely filled in.
Agent's phone Alternative reference Type of development Officer's recommendation
Connect it once with your email address, then ask questions like "which extensions were refused in Crawley last year?" or "what's the planning history of this address?" — no coding, about two minutes to set up. Setup guide →
curl -H "X-Api-Key: pk_..." \ "https://ukplanningapi.co.uk/v1/applications?council_id=214&limit=5"
Council id for Crawley is 214.
Full API reference for developers →
500 lookups a month, free. No card, no password — we email you a sign-in link and you're in.